Should HSA money be allowed to pay for Direct Primary Care services? Yes, according to pending legislation H.R. 6015, a bi-partisan proposal as explained by Wendy Wolfson in Medical Economics. This is being driven by the growing interest in, and availability of DPC practices. Making HSA money eligible for DPC fees lowers the cost of primary care, and would be a win-win for both patient and physician. The article also notes that the American College of Physicians decided not to endorse the bill, calling DPC “potentially a reasonable option as authorized by the ACA in insurance exchanges paired with a wraparound insurance policy covering everything outside of primary care – as long as consumer protections are not weakened.”
You insufferable, duplicitous bastards. Obamacare was by definition a weakening of consumer protections, giving Big Insurance government approval to run riot over consumers with unjustified, unsustainable premium increases. Why would they try to tie DPC, a growing success, to the proven failure that is Obamcare? Why would the ACP not be willing to judge DPC on its own merits? Even if you don’t have insurance for anything else, wouldn’t better access to more affordable primary care be a good idea on its own?
- “… ACP notes that there is little in the way of high quality, independent research on the impact of DPCP models on quality and access.” (And what “independent” research did the ACP use to justify the system they are still trying to defend?)
- “there are concerns that DPCPs may cause access issues for patients, especially among patients who cannot afford to pay directly for care.” (And yet you idiots supported Obamacare, probably as an incremental approach to the single-payer system you endorsed in 2007.)
- ” Physicians in all types of practice must honor their professional obligation to provide nondiscriminatory care, to serve all classes of patients who are in need of medical care and to seek specific opportunities to observe their professional obligation to care for the poor.” (And this sweetly coated sentiment is being used to justify the evil of attempting to force physicians to see everyone for everything all the time. The professional obligations the ACP claims are arbitrary in an age where government auditors, law enforcement, predatory lawyers, vengeful patients, welfare sucks, and the omnipresent media all target physicians.)
- “Physicians who are in or are considering a practice that charges a retainer fee should consider the impact that such a fee would have on their patients and local community, and particularly on lower income and other vulnerable patients, and consider ways to reduce barriers to care for lower income patients that may result from the retainer fee.” (And you cowards helped create the higher prices faced by the low income population.)
- And in a position paper on DPC, this free commercial: ” Physicians should consider the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) as a practice model that has been shown to: improve physician and patient satisfaction with care, outcomes, and accessibility; lower costs; and reduce health care disparities, when supported by appropriate and adequate payment by payers.” (Show to improve…when supported…? What a sad, stupid joke. The PCMH concept has been proven the Potemkin village of primary care and you court jesters want to push it as a way to counter DPC.)
Go read the rest if you like. The ACP tries to fight DPC by making perfect the enemy of better. In the best class warfare logic, the ACP wants to use the poor, remote, and underserved as a block to DPC helping some of the population to have improved – and cheaper – health care. Their logic is that if some are going to be left out in the cold, then you have to keep all your windows and doors open until the government can build a big enough barn to house us all. Their is nothing ethical or even practical about their sorry lies.Tweet