Do You Need a Raincoat if You Can’t Trust the Forecaster?
The American Thinker makes for good daily morning reading, while I’m trying to swill the first half-gallon of coffee, glowering at any staff trying to speak to me before completing that task, and praying no well patient fishing for a work excuse bothers me before I fully wake up. The site has pieces on all sorts of topics, historical and current events, geopolitical, financial, cultural, and this one.
Author Laura Wellington’s piece titled, “Unvaccinated Single Women Say ‘No’ To Vaccinated Single Men” caught my eye because my first thought was it would profile angry women trying to use the promise of their favors to make potential suitors more compliant. But no, this went in a completely different direction: “The overriding concern that the harmful effects of this vaccine may, ultimately, enter these women once the raincoat comes off.”
Gotta admit, that one never occurred to me. Wellington gets into the “relationship” angst about whether a dude so dismissed would feel doubly rejected because of his non-vaccinated status, about which I care not one little bit, then gets to the head of the matter: “Women see it as an act of self-preservation and safety in the face of reality, given the nature of a large portion of men presently. Most will not want to keep that raincoat on for longer than absolutely necessary. With this in mind, until much, much more is uncovered about how this vaccine impacts lives, the decision ‘not to date’ vaccinated men remains steadfast for numerous unvaccinated women.”
The author states, “Even unvaccinated, married women have taken a stand with regards to their husbands’ decisions to take the vaccine or not. Several have noted to me that ‘divorce has been become an option’ if their husbands buckled to the pressure of being vaccinated.” Gotta admit, that never occurred to me.
Nor this: “The same holds true for blood transfusions, which they are also avoiding like the plague due to concerns over “vaccinated” blood being given to them.”
At first, this story seemed sort of goofy, and not plausible. Could mRNA lipid nanoparticles actually make it from the deltoid, into the venous system, survive the cardiac turbulence, and blow all the way down south for a tour of the testicles, only to spike the sperm or somehow otherwise end up intact in the seminal fluid? And then after the rocket ride, get into and through the female mucosa still intact, to set up production in an unsuspecting recipient? That seems (insert joke I’m not going to make in case my mom is reading this). I just ain’t buying it. But that isn’t the point of the story or this column.
Wellington makes the truly critical point that “’no one knows who to trust anymore’ in their opinion. That, in itself, is the only consistent truth these women feel that they can count on.”
And that is the crux of it. There are some worrisome reports, early studies, and lots of ass-covering going on regarding the COVID vaccine. There are also some really crazy things being said that I’ve no interest in repeating until someone can produce something more credible than vague fears and rumors. This piece demonstrates beautifully how the dishonesty of the public health bureaucracy, Big Pharma, government authoritarianism, and corporate cowardice all put the public in a place of not knowing who to trust. As crazy as it seems to think that bad mRNA effects may be sexually transmitted, how easy is it to give into unsubstantiated fears when everyone, EVERYONE has been lying to you for the past two-plus years?
The only thing of which women so concerned may be certain is that the dudes in question will be willing to roll the dice.
