Video of Pfizer Employee Explaining COVID Vaccine Research Debunked?
This was the title of an article in Medpage Today. Feel free to read and see how they NEVER explain how the video was debunked. Here is their only accusation:
It is currently unclear if the man in the video is actually an employee of Pfizer, and if that is his real name.
Unclear? Hmmmm. How about looking into it some more? It’s called investigating.
What does Pfizer say?
Pfizer released a statementopens in a new tab or window on Friday summarily debunking the claims made in the video, noting that the company “has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research” related to its “ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.”
Well, there you have it. If Pfizer says they are NOT doing these things then end of story, right? What kind of reporting is this? The comments to the article at the end are great as 90% of doctors rip this author as well.
The guy in the Pfizer video is Jordan Tristan Walker. Every video is edited. They have to shorten things for people to watch. Was it manipulated? There is no evidence of that. Anyway, Walker’s position was validated by Project Veritas but I can see you being suspicious of that especially if you lean left. Here is the funny thing. You can try Googling Jordan Tristan Walker and his name pretty well scrubbed from the web. Why is that? How is that even possible?
Here is where the story gets better.
The image below is the letter from Pfizer admitting one of their colleagues got filmed and warned others about Project Veritas.
Debunked?
My concerns are this:
- I don’t know if Mr. Walker was trying to impress someone and was bullshitting his story. It’s what guys do. Someone should follow up on this. Politics should stay out of the truth in medicine.
- How does Medpage Today fall for stupid propaganda from Big Pharma? How could they say it was debunked? Oh, they get paid by Pfizer, that’s right. See the cover image on top. Pfizer’s ad is right next to the article! Got that, KevinMD? That is who you sold out to.
Medpage Today needs to apologize and retract its garbage article. And Michael DePeau-Wilson, Enterprise & Investigative Writer, needs to be investigated himself for impersonating a journalist.
LIES,DAMN LIES and MEDSCAPE.. SO MUCH DISAPPOINTMENT IN THE WORLD OF MEDICINE,. NO GUTS NO GLORY……. ARE YOU PREPARED FOR THE BLOWBACK THE POSSIBLE ANGER COMING AT YOU PEDIATRICIANS, FAMILY /IM DOCS.. I was just following orders did not work at Neuremburg, and they are being considered in several countries. Will we in Medicine survive the next several years.. We have much to look forward too. How many of our fellow medical people and Nurses,lab people, radiology folks will survive the vaccines,how many of our children. A recent death at the AIR FORCE ACADEMY was listed as a blood clott after foot surgery. But per the pathologist he also had an Enlarged Heart, Liver and Spleen.. In a 19 or 20 y/o male.. No he is a victim of Vax Mandates..Hang on,more coming…Pray for us all and our nation.We screwed ourselves.. No I did not take the Vax,neither has my son or his wife,but both my daughters and grandkids did.. What will be the cost? Pray for our nation
This was a note I sent to the Medscape scumbags a couple weeks ago:
“Today you pushed an article by a biased source, implying that it was factual by giving your imprimatur, that Florida Gov. DeSantis was lying about COVID boosters increasing the likelihood of COVID infection. You quoted one of the study’s authors saying, “ The dose is, in fact, effective in preventing infection.”
That is a lie. Moreover, numerous data from multiple nations indicate that those who are multi-boosted ARE at greater risk for infection/reinfection.
I don’t know who finds Medscape, but it is clear that you are bought off, and completely corrupt. I am blocking my email subscription, and in the publications to which I contribute, will advise readers how corrupt and phony you are.”
Medscape is a propaganda site, but I love commenting on there and bursting heads.
Med whaaaatttt? I hardly remember it. I think I looked at their free teasers but never paid the money to “subscribe”. Got enough free “throw away” journals to keep up-to-date. Actually when I glanced at some of them, had decent information I could confirm with search engines on the internet after “it” matured.
A 28.8k telephone modem was a pain but with text only stuff, it was fast enough. Actually started out with a 14.4k modem, and used a 2.4k on an antique 8086-10Mhz machine more as an experiment later on. Internet was just coming out when the 8086 computers reigned for a very short period of time. Weren’t meant for high speed internet use but with a 2.4k modem could get some work done looking up text only stuff. Sending text out at 2.4k wasn’t so bad and was pretty quick for the day. Did my email on it for many years at the office when I was off duty. That was before infamous EHR too that has bedeviled docs since its’ dastardly forced inception.
Freenets were the rage out of local colleges and universities at the time, late 80’s and early 90’s. Folks could register for free access in the early 90’s. I had a free email address for years out of a local university though I never attended there. I did end up donating a pittance for the access. I “mean” pittance as I was only a primary care doc.
Anyone remember Archie, Veronica or Gopher search engines? That’s how old I am. I used them for scientific searches I was interested in back then that didn’t have anything to do with medicine for me. I had to get away from that to decompress from primary care. Oh shoot, first time I saw a landscape picture online I thought that was something. Al Gore didn’t invent the internet. I was in college in the mid 70’s and I had a friend, Al B., who was an early computer geek. Looked the part too with glasses and long Einstein like hair. Liked answering my stupid questions about computing and we became friends. He explained the ARPANET to me which was a 1960’s defense department experiment with computer communication (google it). Al B. explained to me about “packets” and how if a packet can’t get a direct line to a receiving computer due to the intervening computer(s) being blown up in a nuclear attack, it could take a round about way with surviving “nodes” to get there. I am now amazed as Al B. said to me and I remember this distinctly, “It’s an Internetwork” back in the 70’s. I swear to God that’s the first time I heard the term Internet though “work” was appended to the end by Al back then. Cripes it hadn’t even been invented yet as we know it! It was like 1975-76! I couldn’t afford a computer for personal use until around 1990. A 486-100 Mhz machine.
First time I paid to get a program called “Slipknot” I could use on my university computer modem link (where I never attended mind you) to go on the early web. I was amazed at some of the academic sites and pictures for learning purposes. I could look up stuff and sometimes find it using the early search engines I mentioned above. It was too early for porn. That came later to clog up bandwidth. Slipknot was an early program before Netscape and Windows browsers were even released. Well I rambled OT long enough. So sorry. Kurt Savegnago
Medico-journalism is a fetid open sewer. Take a look at Medscape on any particular day.